Barack Obama’s Questionable Fundraising And The Gay Lifestyle Being Forced On Massachusetts Children

There is so much to be concerned about over Barack Obama that it boggles the mind how Old Media deliberately tries to ignore the situation. Obama’s relationship with domestic terrorist Bill Ayers. Obama’s relationship with Tony Rezko. Obama’s relationship with the New Socialist Party. None of that ever made it to the front pages of the New York Tiems nor the Washington Post and none of it was ever the lead story for any of the major networks.

Now, we have another concern. Where is Barack Obama getting all of this campaign cash from?

Michael Isikoff at Newsweek sheds some light on this. He notes that the Obama campaign recieved donations from people named “Good Will” and “Doodad pro.”

In two recent letters to the Obama campaign, Federal Election Commission auditors flagged those (and other) donors and informed the campaign that the sums had to be returned. Neither name had ever been publicly reported because both individuals made online donations in $10 and $25 increments. “Good Will” listed his employer as “Loving” and his occupation as “You,” while supplying as his address 1015 Norwood Park Boulevard, which is shared by the Austin nonprofit Goodwill Industries. Suzanha Burmeister, marketing director for Goodwill, said the group had “no clue” who the donor was. She added, however, that the group had received five puzzling thank-you letters from the Obama campaign this year, prompting it to send the campaign an e-mail in September pointing out the apparent fraudulent use of its name.

“Doodad Pro” listed no occupation or employer; the contributor’s listed address is shared by Lloyd and Lynn’s Liquor Store in Nunda. “I have never heard of such an individual,” says Diane Beardsley, who works at the store and is the mother of one of the owners. “Nobody at this store has that much money to contribute.” (She added that a Doodad’s Boutique, located next door, had closed a year ago, before the donations were made.)

That looks exactly like the corrupt, Chicago-style politics that Barack Obama was mentored in by people like Bill Ayers.

The silence of the major networks on this issue is deafening. Can you imagine the hubbub if it were John McCain getting donations like this? It would be the lead story for weeks.

You can access the complete article on-line here:

Obama’s ‘Good Will’ Hunting
Michael Isikoff
October 4, 2008

And the assault on our children grows worse every day. In Massachusetts, a Federal Court ruled that it is okay for Kindergarten teachers to indoctrinate six-year-olds on how to be gay and the Court said that parents do not have the right to opt their children out of it. The U.S. Supreme Court has refused to hear the case.

From World Net Daily:

The U.S. Supreme Court without comment has refused to intervene in a case prompted by the actions of officials at Estabrook Elementary school in Lexington, Mass., who not only were teaching homosexuality to young children, but specifically refused to allow Christian parents to opt their children out of the indoctrination.

The dispute grabbed headlines when Parker, on April 27, 2005, “was arrested and thrown in jail by school officials over his insistence on being notified regarding his son in kindergarten being taught about homosexual relationships by adults,” Mass Resistance reported.

Another family was alarmed by a similar situation a short time later as the school not only continued its indoctrination, but “became more hostile to the Parkers, and local liberals and homosexual activists did their best to harass the family,” Mass Resistance reported.

In fact, the school, led by Supt. Paul Ash, then stated in school publications they would not “compromise” on any points regarding the homosexual agenda.

Clearly, this is another attempt by gays and lesbians to get access to little children. If you are concerned parent, you should get to know this case very well. Otherwise, some gay or lesbian will be making attempts to get to know your son or daughter behind your back.

You can access the complete article on-line here:

Decision To Teach Kids To Be ‘Gay’ Allowed To Stand
Bob Unruh
World Net Daily
October 8, 2008


One Response

  1. This is a very sobering indictment especially since most ecommerce software has several checks (such as Billing ZIP check and CVV check) turned ON by default when solutions are newly installed. Web site/revenue managers would have to make a conscious decision that they want these checks turned off and would have to change software settings (pretty easy) to do so.

    For 15 years, I have developed secure card processing software for a major shopping cart processor. Since we offer a free secure shopping cart, we have a lot of experience with new and inexperienced merchants processing credit cards for the first time. I can tell you this: it’s not a case of ignorance or naïveté, especially since this credit card security issue has been so widely discussed online, and we have many proofs that this administration is highly aware of critical discussions taking place in the blogosphere.

    Doing what we’ve observed does not require a special arrangement or a conspiracy with the credit card companies: any tiny merchant on the internet could do the same, even with Paypal. After 60 or 90 days, the credit card company would want to have a ‘serious’ conversation with you, but all you would have to do is promise remedial action and you can continue merrily on your way without getting serious about remediation.

    The more serious issue is compliance with FEC regulations and federal campaign law – it’s very obvious that the campaign was actively trying to solicit foreign contributions (illegal) when you visit pages like: where the activist controls on the site even report to everyone how much foreign activist fundraising has taken place in the Paris group. Since most of the page is in French, I seriously doubt that all of the $39,000+ was raised by citizen expatriates in Paris. The common billing address check and a simple SQL query would have prevented so many foreign contributions.

    My exit question is this: if this activity is what we observed prior to the election, if this candidate was so careless with common checks that most merchants use, what kind of care and diligence can we expect when this guy has his hands on the US budget?

    Ron Robinson

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: